Nov 20th 2011, 20:50:56
Quick memo to netting alliances here and a few recent items:
It seems we have a few gutless players roaming around in FFA. These players are hitting IMP after we are mostly restarts and also growing in netting alliances to gain momentous size to hit IMP later, at least one of these alliances IMP had a signed pact with. So it seems that netting alliances are making a few bad choices in who they are letting in. Going forward, IMP will be acting on a new policy until further notice mentioned later in this thread.
In addition, I signed a CF with CC which included provisions to not hit both UNC and llaar, only to have been declared on them later. I sent a PM to both mdevol and akula, who signed the CF, with no response.
Lastly, IMP also received more than a few hits from PANLV throughout our war. A few of these hits were from PANLV countries way out of range for IMP retals. Not to mention, just before the war with UNC/llaar, IMP received an excessive RoR from a PANLV country. This member retalled L:L and then bought up ridiculous amounts of military to prevent retals after a message was sent informing him of the RoR. I have always made good on my end of FA issues where IMP is in the wrong, and had recently done-so with bigwiggle on a recent FA issue where I offered him free grabs for our mistake. I sent PMs to both Havoc and bigwiggle on the grabbing issues while we are at war, both unanswered.
Here are a few changes:
===============================================
First, IMP will not protect or refuse to war any alliance as a pact agreement or ceasefire. IMP will kill any alliance of any size that it deems to be a threat, regardless of cross-tag protection. There will be no negotiations with this.
If a player grows in your tag under any amount of time, and then detags to either A) join a tag hitting/warring IMP or B) solo-kills IMP, IMP will expect you to kill all countries involved, regardless of detag time. Failure to do so will be considered an immediate act of war.
Conversely, all netting alliances will be considered for a UNAP by IMP and will be given the opportunity to grow peacefully for however long they choose without fear of grabs or war from IMP. Send me a PM here or find me on IRC to arrange something for the upcoming round. This does not exclude any alliance, regardless of our past. There will be necessary discussions about specific players in your tag with a history of being a gutless dipfluff - we can discuss in length how to handle.
In addition, when IMP cannot secure police while in war, IMP will retal all landgrabs 2:1. If we consider our good graces to be abused during this time, we will kill the offenders.
PANLV, find me on IRC and you will be granted 100% compensation for your land, cash, and stock that was lost in the recent exchange beginning at the beginning of next round. You also have my personal apologies. Any other alliance that IMP may have wronged lately, you will be granted compensation as well, although I do not know of any other specific cases.
Feel free to find me on #imp for any discussions. I will be contacting some of you individually as I find you.
It seems we have a few gutless players roaming around in FFA. These players are hitting IMP after we are mostly restarts and also growing in netting alliances to gain momentous size to hit IMP later, at least one of these alliances IMP had a signed pact with. So it seems that netting alliances are making a few bad choices in who they are letting in. Going forward, IMP will be acting on a new policy until further notice mentioned later in this thread.
In addition, I signed a CF with CC which included provisions to not hit both UNC and llaar, only to have been declared on them later. I sent a PM to both mdevol and akula, who signed the CF, with no response.
Lastly, IMP also received more than a few hits from PANLV throughout our war. A few of these hits were from PANLV countries way out of range for IMP retals. Not to mention, just before the war with UNC/llaar, IMP received an excessive RoR from a PANLV country. This member retalled L:L and then bought up ridiculous amounts of military to prevent retals after a message was sent informing him of the RoR. I have always made good on my end of FA issues where IMP is in the wrong, and had recently done-so with bigwiggle on a recent FA issue where I offered him free grabs for our mistake. I sent PMs to both Havoc and bigwiggle on the grabbing issues while we are at war, both unanswered.
Here are a few changes:
===============================================
First, IMP will not protect or refuse to war any alliance as a pact agreement or ceasefire. IMP will kill any alliance of any size that it deems to be a threat, regardless of cross-tag protection. There will be no negotiations with this.
If a player grows in your tag under any amount of time, and then detags to either A) join a tag hitting/warring IMP or B) solo-kills IMP, IMP will expect you to kill all countries involved, regardless of detag time. Failure to do so will be considered an immediate act of war.
Conversely, all netting alliances will be considered for a UNAP by IMP and will be given the opportunity to grow peacefully for however long they choose without fear of grabs or war from IMP. Send me a PM here or find me on IRC to arrange something for the upcoming round. This does not exclude any alliance, regardless of our past. There will be necessary discussions about specific players in your tag with a history of being a gutless dipfluff - we can discuss in length how to handle.
In addition, when IMP cannot secure police while in war, IMP will retal all landgrabs 2:1. If we consider our good graces to be abused during this time, we will kill the offenders.
PANLV, find me on IRC and you will be granted 100% compensation for your land, cash, and stock that was lost in the recent exchange beginning at the beginning of next round. You also have my personal apologies. Any other alliance that IMP may have wronged lately, you will be granted compensation as well, although I do not know of any other specific cases.
Feel free to find me on #imp for any discussions. I will be contacting some of you individually as I find you.