Aug 3rd 2012, 15:59:55
Originally posted by Pang:
Originally posted by Sov:
Originally posted by Pang:
sol shared planning with evo, evo posted it, hanlong stole it from evo...
i think you're just looking at specific events to try and find things that didn't involve cheating, which, imo, is clutching at straws...
I know you're not talking to me there (as I do actually know the whole of the story, probably far more than you), butas I said, I think that LaF+SoF would have won the conflict without the intel, but it just would have been a much BETTER conflict for everyone. It could at least be one that we talk about now in a better light than this.
I am talking about last set, I think you are talking about a different conflict.
I am not clutching at straws or trying to find examples that did not involve cheating. I am pointing out that the current state of many Alliances is not Hanlong's fault as many people would have you believe. SOL's current position is more of their own doing than LAF's.
Hanlong is a very convenient fall guy for SOL's own woes.
Oh ya, I'm definitely not talking about last round. I'm talking about rounds before the cat was out of the bag. but the momentum gained from those conflicts is what allows laf/sof to thrive in conflicts such as this round, so SoL has somewhat of a point... but as time passes, that argument loses steam fast.
LaF, in the end, used the same strategies SoL did to grow in size, retain members and win wars (lesser extent here, though), so it would be hypocritial of SoL to flame LaF too much for essentially adopting SoL's tactics...
I don`t think Sol leaders hacked the game and it`s site. The rest of it - they prolly did it ...