Nov 8th 2012, 5:21:06
"Romney had a pretty solid record as Governor of a very liberal state where he routinely had to work across the aisle."
Incorrect. He was unavailable, aloof, and did no such bipartisan work. Everyone hated him -- even state Republicans.
"Agree with his record or disagree, he understands the fundamentals of leadership and management."
Incorrect. All he does is tell people they’re wrong. That’s neither leadership nor management. As an example, his words show he knows absolutely nothing about the concept of buy-in.. mainly because achieving buy-in requires humility. "Buy-in" refers to people wanting to work with him.. and nobody did.
"By contrast, Pres. Obama has shown he's a good speaker, but doesn't have the faintest of clues about working across the aisle--evidenced by demonizing his opponents as "country club Republicans" and totally blowing what would have been a huge bipartisan deal because he didn't orchestrate it."
Incorrect. Republicans refuse to work. The republican definition of “bipartisan” is “doing everything Republicans want” – and obviously that’s not happening. I find it shocking that you can't get past your assumption that Democrats will do whatever you want if only you whine enough. You will never convince a majority of the country that the inaction is Democrat fault -- seriously, that's pure Faux BS.
"He's far from a leader and if you read Woodward's book, you see that even Nancy Pelosi put him on mute because she realized he was ineffective."
Incorrect. Bob Woodward has been a Republican mouthpiece ever since Watergate.
If you don't understand how the GOP strategy of the last three and a half years affected you on a national basis, no matter what the gerrymandered House district yahoo votes told you, then you will be the party of nothing more than bodies in the road. If you think the lesson is that you weren't conservative enough, you know nothing about the United States. I look forward to the inevitable endless investigations of nonsense before the push for impeachment. Because you're a Republican - and wasting time with irrelevant pandering is much easier to do than actually governing.
Incorrect. He was unavailable, aloof, and did no such bipartisan work. Everyone hated him -- even state Republicans.
"Agree with his record or disagree, he understands the fundamentals of leadership and management."
Incorrect. All he does is tell people they’re wrong. That’s neither leadership nor management. As an example, his words show he knows absolutely nothing about the concept of buy-in.. mainly because achieving buy-in requires humility. "Buy-in" refers to people wanting to work with him.. and nobody did.
"By contrast, Pres. Obama has shown he's a good speaker, but doesn't have the faintest of clues about working across the aisle--evidenced by demonizing his opponents as "country club Republicans" and totally blowing what would have been a huge bipartisan deal because he didn't orchestrate it."
Incorrect. Republicans refuse to work. The republican definition of “bipartisan” is “doing everything Republicans want” – and obviously that’s not happening. I find it shocking that you can't get past your assumption that Democrats will do whatever you want if only you whine enough. You will never convince a majority of the country that the inaction is Democrat fault -- seriously, that's pure Faux BS.
"He's far from a leader and if you read Woodward's book, you see that even Nancy Pelosi put him on mute because she realized he was ineffective."
Incorrect. Bob Woodward has been a Republican mouthpiece ever since Watergate.
If you don't understand how the GOP strategy of the last three and a half years affected you on a national basis, no matter what the gerrymandered House district yahoo votes told you, then you will be the party of nothing more than bodies in the road. If you think the lesson is that you weren't conservative enough, you know nothing about the United States. I look forward to the inevitable endless investigations of nonsense before the push for impeachment. Because you're a Republican - and wasting time with irrelevant pandering is much easier to do than actually governing.