Rankings:
TIER 1
1. SF. Have been a big force sicne joining the server. Will be tough to maintain this level of activity and war performance long term will be fun to see if they can though.
2. NBK. Used to be SFs position.... now they have been surpassed as alpha on the server. Will be interesting to see them battle back, it makes for fun war watching! NBK has been able to maintain the same level for so long and i expect them to be the top dog again at some point.
3. TKO. ASet TNW record. starting to lag behind PAN in ANW battles, but nearly double the members more then make up for that. politically fairly well off and nets pretty consistently with a few blips in the server.

TIER 2
4. Pan. Switched places with TKO from a few sets ago... used to be bigger but worse at ANW. Now are smaller and doing GREAT with ANW. been doing better at avoiding wars recently espcially after the GD attemmpt failed misserably.
5. Focus. Focus is very consistent and does what focus does.... wars fairly well, doesnt net that well, and is always a force you cant ignore.
6. CC. Started to falter a bit. Most of main leadership is inactive/left. still got a great core, but needs to rebuild a bit.
7. ELY. Great first set. will be interesting to see what there future holds.

TIER 3
8. ESD. Small, but effective netters. If dragon can not self destruct they will do what you expect from ESD.
9. IMP. really needs to work on how to run an effective country. A netting set or two would probably help them notice how inefficient there builds are. Not a good clan, not a scary clan, but can anoye betters.
10.Ares. Small clan,not great netters, alright warrers.
11.llaar. Horribly run, basically a spam tag witha bit of protection. A few goodmembers, but needs better control of them/
12. Salt. Fell apart last set.

PAN is ranked too high. They suck. I hear they have Havoc in their clan, too.

Now update our wiki page ketchup ;)

llaar is ranked too high

Damn you ketchup:p I am working on a comprehensive stats based all time rankings atm... It should be done soon. Sf is waay too high. They will not retain their membership just as lae and cc couldn't.

THis is the current make up, not all time stats!

we're not good enough to make the list. :(

It's because Ketchup is rather biased. :P

"8. ESD. Small, but effective netters. If dragon can not self destruct they will do what you expect from ESD."


Ouch. But true. Dragon needs to shape up.

Because you werent around last set!

Dragon you tend to sometimes self delete over 1 grab, or get pissed off andmake rash decisions sometimes=P

i thought you said this was the current make up. :P

I'll do an unbiased ranking later this set. :)

TKO politically well off.. I guess that's what happens when you sleep with NBKers:p

He is sleeping with NBK and we still didnt get a pact. Ketch must be fluff in bed :P

so having the same 6 people for 3 resets in a row... makes it a spam tag?

i'll run things the way i want to run things, and we're pacted to you ketchup, watch what you say, thats not really cool.

multis count?


just kidding llaar. it was too easy to pass up.

That should let you know just where his priorities really are. :P

FS them llaar!

So maybe not a spam tag, but it just seems like it with your string of "Oh, sorry, it's some noob in my tag" excuses.

Feel free to run your tag the way you want, but don't be pissed off when people think your tag sucks when you're running a tag that regularly does excessive grabs and retals against legitimate retals.

jefferson's baby !!
we are moven' on up !!

If tier 2 and tier 3 rally together we could take down those tier 1 tyrants

especially considering 2 of the 3 tier 1 clans are killing each other :P

It's the perfect storm. They're fluffed.

Ketchup you can go ahead and have TKO switch spots with us in tier 1 if you want .. I'll call off the assault

i think 45-60 mil avg nw for a warring alliance is a bit better then not that well, maybe avg even!

llaar- Basicly what wiggle said. And the fact that you got tagkilled twice lsat set,once because a member started attacking and got you in trouble.

Just not as much contorla nd its gotten you in trouble.

Well you're in trouble then. Without SALT you can't make Ketchup.

He does have a point, but I'm sure a salt-less ketchup could be developed with a similar taste.

http://www.lowsaltmarket.com/...ics/00000001/Ketchup1.jpg

where are SAS and AOD? this is bias rankings

Too small to register=P