Verified:

Primeval Game profile

Game Moderator
Mod Boss
3183

Nov 20th 2011, 20:50:56

Quick memo to netting alliances here and a few recent items:

It seems we have a few gutless players roaming around in FFA. These players are hitting IMP after we are mostly restarts and also growing in netting alliances to gain momentous size to hit IMP later; at least one of these alliances IMP had a signed pact with. So it seems that netting alliances are making a few bad choices in who they are letting in. Going forward, IMP will be acting on a new policy until further notice mentioned later in this thread.

In addition, I signed a CF with CC which included provisions to not hit both UNC and llaar, only to have been declared on them later. I sent a PM to both mdevol and akula, who signed the CF, with no response.

Lastly, IMP also received more than a few hits from PANLV throughout our war. A few of these hits were from PANLV countries way out of range for IMP retals. Not to mention, just before the war with UNC/llaar, IMP received an excessive RoR from a PANLV country. This member retalled L:L and then bought up ridiculous amounts of military to prevent retals after a message was sent informing him of the RoR. I have always made good on my end of FA issues where IMP is in the wrong, and had recently done-so with bigwiggle on a recent FA issue where I offered him free grabs for our mistake. I sent PMs to both Havoc and bigwiggle on the grabbing issues while we are at war, both unanswered.

Here are a few changes:

===============================================

First, IMP will not protect or refuse to war any alliance as a pact agreement or ceasefire. IMP will kill any alliance of any size that it deems to be a legitmate threat, regardless of cross-tag protection. There will be no negotiations with this.

If a player grows in your tag under any amount of time, and then detags to either A) join a tag hitting/warring IMP or B) solo-kills IMP, IMP will expect you to kill all countries involved, regardless of detag time. Failure to do so will be considered an immediate act of war.

Conversely, all netting alliances will be considered for a UNAP by IMP and will be given the opportunity to grow peacefully for however long they choose without fear of grabs or war from IMP. Send me a PM here or find me on IRC to arrange something for the upcoming round. This does not exclude any alliance, regardless of our past. There will be necessary discussions about specific players in your tag with a history of being a gutless dipfluff - we can discuss in length how to handle.

In addition, when IMP cannot secure police while in war, IMP will retal all landgrabs 2:1. If we consider our good graces to be abused during this time, we will kill the offenders.

PANLV, find me on IRC and you will be granted 100% compensation for your land, cash, and stock that was lost in the recent exchange beginning at the beginning of next round. You also have my personal apologies. Any other alliance that IMP may have wronged lately, you will be granted compensation as well, although I do not know of any other specific cases.

Feel free to find me on #imp for any discussions. I will be contacting some of you individually as I find you.


Edited By: Primeval on Nov 20th 2011, 20:56:35
See Original Post

Celeborn Game profile

Member
268

Nov 20th 2011, 21:14:19

impressive

<tips hat>
I am,
therefore I RAGE.

mrford Game profile

Member
21,417

Nov 20th 2011, 21:22:39

lol, sounds like IMP wants to die every set. you want to war every thag that has members that legitly detag for 72+ hours and kills you, then you will be really busy.

Ketchup is the only person i gave the tag pass to, and not 48 hours later i had 80 countries in my tag. In case you didnt know, your killing of netting tags and small tags over the past sets has pissed people off, and they will band together when bored and kill you.

thats the way it is....you need to change your image, not your policy.
Swagger of a Chupacabra

[21:37:01] <&KILLERfluffY> when I was doing FA stuff for sof the person who gave me the longest angry rant was Mr Ford

Dibs Ludicrous Game profile

Member
6702

Nov 20th 2011, 21:24:28

http://forums.earthempires.com/...-shouldn-t-have-countries

llaar said you weren't allowed any countries until next set. who are you to defy llaar?
There are no messages in your Inbox.
Elvis has left the building.

Donny Game profile

Member
6026

Nov 20th 2011, 21:41:28

Lol. i <3 llaar and mford?? wish theyd both come back to CC :(
ICQ-105967052



Dear Asians who say they're not ninjas just because they're Asian,
That's exactly what a ninja would say.

ZIP Game profile

Member
3222

Nov 20th 2011, 23:12:34

wow good luck with that
fluff your 300 Spartans fool - i have 32 of the biggest fluffed mother fluffers made of titanium !!
A brigade from Blackstreetboyz (#91) has invaded your lands! Your defenses held against the invaders and forced them away! Your military lost:1 Troops

Warster Game profile

Member
4179

Nov 21st 2011, 1:48:06

Will imp accept the same policy back on them ??
FFA- TKO Leader
Alliance- Monsters

MSN
ICQ 28629332

PapaSmurf Game profile

Member
1225

Nov 21st 2011, 3:18:02

Originally posted by Warster:
Will imp accept the same policy back on them ??

llaar Game profile

Member
11,340

Nov 21st 2011, 3:52:28

Originally posted by Dibs Ludicrous:
llaar said you weren't allowed any countries until next set. who are you to defy llaar?


i'm llaar, and i approve this message

Primeval Game profile

Game Moderator
Mod Boss
3183

Nov 21st 2011, 5:20:44

Originally posted by Warster:
Will imp accept the same policy back on them ??


I assume you mean the provision regarding detags and war. Yes, IMP will use this policy as a two-way street. If a player grows in our tag and wars an alliance in which we have an agreement with as mentioned above, we will kill them.

This policy is an opportunity for netting tags to play without hits or war from IMP. All we're asking is that they take responsibility for the gutless players using their tag for protection prior to hostile use.

bertz Game profile

Member
1638

Nov 21st 2011, 6:16:23

DETAH to IMP

smegma Game profile

Member
EE Patron
2953

Nov 21st 2011, 17:44:12

Hmmmm. A sane post from Imp? Have they restarted their meds?

Rockman Game profile

Member
3388

Nov 21st 2011, 18:53:45

If a war alliance (IMP) retals all grabs while warring 2:1, does IMP accept a netting alliance retalling all grabs 2:1 while netting? Or does IMP have a double standard?

EViL

Member
249

Nov 21st 2011, 19:03:32

Originally posted by Rockman:
If a war alliance (IMP) retals all grabs while warring 2:1, does IMP accept a netting alliance retalling all grabs 2:1 while netting? Or does IMP have a double standard?


stupid post. troll fail

Rockman Game profile

Member
3388

Nov 21st 2011, 19:09:40

Originally posted by EViL:
Originally posted by Rockman:
If a war alliance (IMP) retals all grabs while warring 2:1, does IMP accept a netting alliance retalling all grabs 2:1 while netting? Or does IMP have a double standard?


stupid post. troll fail


Learn to defend your land so that you don't have to use 2:1 retals.

Havoc Game profile

Member
4042

Nov 21st 2011, 19:24:37

Originally posted by Rockman:
If a war alliance (IMP) retals all grabs while warring 2:1, does IMP accept a netting alliance retalling all grabs 2:1 while netting? Or does IMP have a double standard?


post of the set.
Havoc
Unholy Monks | The Omega

EViL

Member
249

Nov 21st 2011, 20:02:10

Originally posted by Rockman:
Originally posted by EViL:
Originally posted by Rockman:
If a war alliance (IMP) retals all grabs while warring 2:1, does IMP accept a netting alliance retalling all grabs 2:1 while netting? Or does IMP have a double standard?


stupid post. troll fail


Learn to defend your land so that you don't have to use 2:1 retals.


Defend land at the end of the round after war number 2? Troll fail number 2. Wanna go for the hat trick?

Originally posted by Havoc:
Originally posted by Rockman:
If a war alliance (IMP) retals all grabs while warring 2:1, does IMP accept a netting alliance retalling all grabs 2:1 while netting? Or does IMP have a double standard?


post of the set.


ha. really? Do better Havoc. You're supposed to be better than this.

Juusto Game profile

Member
336

Nov 21st 2011, 20:11:56

so EVIL if you cant defend your land after your second war aka ppl arent allowed to grab you... then why are you allowed to grab a netting tags after your wars?


just a question.
FFA: PANLV
MSN:

ICe Man

Member
1398

Nov 21st 2011, 20:51:22

after your second war most netters should be able to farm the "shizzle" out of you and then jump out of your attack range. If not than the netter deserves to be 2:1'd ;)

*stir* *stir*
Thank God, for I'm a blessed man.

QM Diver Game profile

Member
1096

Nov 22nd 2011, 1:34:55

Originally posted by Rockman:
If a war alliance (IMP) retals all grabs while warring 2:1, does IMP accept a netting alliance retalling all grabs 2:1 while netting? Or does IMP have a double standard?



Ummm, could repeat the question, please?

*forces a straight face*
Natural Born Killers
PreZ

Primeval Game profile

Game Moderator
Mod Boss
3183

Nov 22nd 2011, 23:15:05

One signed, one pending.

You know where to find me.

Warster Game profile

Member
4179

Nov 23rd 2011, 0:49:40

I've been idling in # imp when online :)
FFA- TKO Leader
Alliance- Monsters

MSN
ICQ 28629332

Warster Game profile

Member
4179

Nov 24th 2011, 21:36:09

Sent a pm to u prime but u haven't replied
FFA- TKO Leader
Alliance- Monsters

MSN
ICQ 28629332

Primeval Game profile

Game Moderator
Mod Boss
3183

Nov 25th 2011, 1:21:52

Stopped playing for about 2 days. I'll get back to you soon.

Primeval Game profile

Game Moderator
Mod Boss
3183

Nov 30th 2011, 16:44:22

bump