Aug 26th 2014, 12:56:27
http://earthempires.com/...-up-to-laf-32908/3#596308
"tella, you're an idiot that has no idea what a good player looks like because you've never had one in your alliance. In regards to your comments on candy, and I'm being 100% honest here, it was because I literally had no other options (nobody wanted to do the FR work or had any experience in it - this much should be obvious when you consider how little information I actually shared with him)."
Ignoring the flippancy of your response, let's have a real talk about this. In my original post, I admitted straight up that Laf has a huge chunk of the best netters in the game. I don't think anyone who knows anything would dispute this. But the sheer arrogance of your(and many other Laffers) position is mind-boggling. Saying that Laf is the ONLY alliance with good netters is just stupid.
Look at the stats for a second. Who's the player with the best top 3 score? How many of the top 10 are Laffers? The top 20? I believe it is definitely not 100%....
http://earthempires.com/...ance/leaderboards?type=13
Now add to that the fact that Evo absolutely dominates average networth on most real netting sets. Not always, like last set, or the massive trading set about two years ago, but most sets. Do you know the biggest reason we do so well in that category? Slagpit and a few others, like Tertius, Osso and our other strategists. Slagpit had an understanding of the ins and outs of the game that could rival any one of your best netters, I guarantee you. He had the single biggest impact on Evo's netting development and the work he did 3-4 years ago is still keeping us strong today.
Again, if you'd put your ego aside, you'd see that I'm not bashing Laf or saying you guys aren't good, cause you damn well are. Your top players are better than most, but to simply say that the ONLY good netters in this game play in Laf is absurd.
"tella, you're an idiot that has no idea what a good player looks like because you've never had one in your alliance. In regards to your comments on candy, and I'm being 100% honest here, it was because I literally had no other options (nobody wanted to do the FR work or had any experience in it - this much should be obvious when you consider how little information I actually shared with him)."
Ignoring the flippancy of your response, let's have a real talk about this. In my original post, I admitted straight up that Laf has a huge chunk of the best netters in the game. I don't think anyone who knows anything would dispute this. But the sheer arrogance of your(and many other Laffers) position is mind-boggling. Saying that Laf is the ONLY alliance with good netters is just stupid.
Look at the stats for a second. Who's the player with the best top 3 score? How many of the top 10 are Laffers? The top 20? I believe it is definitely not 100%....
http://earthempires.com/...ance/leaderboards?type=13
Now add to that the fact that Evo absolutely dominates average networth on most real netting sets. Not always, like last set, or the massive trading set about two years ago, but most sets. Do you know the biggest reason we do so well in that category? Slagpit and a few others, like Tertius, Osso and our other strategists. Slagpit had an understanding of the ins and outs of the game that could rival any one of your best netters, I guarantee you. He had the single biggest impact on Evo's netting development and the work he did 3-4 years ago is still keeping us strong today.
Again, if you'd put your ego aside, you'd see that I'm not bashing Laf or saying you guys aren't good, cause you damn well are. Your top players are better than most, but to simply say that the ONLY good netters in this game play in Laf is absurd.


EE Patron