I wanted to throw this out there.

IMP and TITTIES are having a blast with our little war. Dastardly move by TITTIES but what can you expect from a bunch of boobs?

This whole situation had me thinking.

Wouldn't FFA be a lot more fun with 20 small clans of 48-64 countries than just 4-5 big ones that are typically the same old names, leaders, players?

Part of the fun that had me hooked on this game years back was the idea that I could start my own clan and lead it to greatness. Now a days, that is all but impossible.

However, if greatness only took finding 4 players who work great together. Now that's a real possibility.

Anyways, I would love to hear some other peoples thoughts about the subject.

I was just saying that same thing to Cow today :P

It would be fun if all big and small clans would agree that in a year ( 6 resets ) the server will be having 4 war resets and 2 netting resets - Net_War_War_Net_War_War. Big VS Big ( ICD-TKO-NBK-CC ) and Small VS Small ( PAN-Ares-TITS-IMP-etc ) - a round robin schedule. Just a thought though i think it would be impossible.. :)

That would take a lot of commitment and planning. The idea with many small clans is that with 20 alliances actively maneuvering the FFA landscape it would bring some of the most interesting parts of FFA back to the game. Namely, back room dealing, back stabbing, revenge, etc. Cascading alliance wars, etc.

Plus a 48 vs 48 war is much more sustainable after a FS than other types. Even for netting clans (see IMP vs TITTIES compared to CC vs Chaos)

Wars with rules? no no no no! That takes all the fun out of it :P

For me, the more the merrier. I doubt that these members of established big clans will go on separately and form another tag with 2-4 members. Team chemistry will be the issue including team ativity and strategy. With constant warring, a clan can develop effective strategies through experience to challenge other clans for supremacy in terms of war/netting.

I love the idea, subby. But the problem is that the pool of players that can actively play 16 countries is rather small. If there was an effort to make team sized type member bases (5 people, aka 80 countries) at most, that could be intersting, but that would take a bunch of effort outside the game. Even then, people will complain if the game weret o have a playground style fof picking sides at the start of the set.

Good idea, I want it to work. I love a good war, how can we make it happen next set.

Itd just turn into team where u have 4 small clans that still act as 1 big one.

Yeah Crippler is right. What would prevent people from acting as one alliance anyway?
Using tags like TAG1, TAG2, TAG3, or with junior-tags. People will always find a way around this idea. I kinda love it though, 4-5 people per tag would be cool

Isn't that the purpose of team server? I never played it myself

team is supposed to be teams of 5 members in each team and each team is on their own but ..........