i think we first asked this question in two thousand and ten, trife. try playing for longer than four years and eight months.

(CITATION NEEDED)

yes but we can't reach consensus.

ya don't say!

Lol

whatever Marshall keep on trolling

i don't have anything to do with this mess since i'm not in stones nor in evo.

This matter has been decided over a decade ago and a consensus was in fact reached.

According to Alliance retal policies posted to Wiki.....

LaF, Moral Decay, Evolution, Omega, Paradigm, The Pinoy Alliance have all posted a definition of what a topfeed is and the penalties greater than Land:Land associated with a topfeed

LCN and Rage don't specifically mention topfeeds but do have a Land:Land retal policy that quarenntees them to get all their land back

One Man's Army adopts the retal policy of attacker's clan

There is no mention of the retal policy at all from SoL and SoF

Imag is the only Alliance that posted that they don't recognize topfeeds

YEAH!
What OTH said!

I think it's a moot point...Stones pretty much have all their turns stored to probably hit us, apparently them FSing will somehow prove that there's no such thing as topfeeding? Or maybe it's going to prove that their policies have to be enforced on any other alliance they choose?

Don't know why this thread was even created, m0bzta has even responded to my multiple messages, so what's his job? :P

Hey Stones...when you hit, aim for me first, I'm #257. I've got a busy weekend with family and won't be around to put up with your childish little antics. Next time you think you can enforce your own policies, know that instead, you're just silly little kids who think you mean something by pissing other people off and nipping at their heels instead of actually making any kind of difference.

If you piss off enough people, you'll find that you'll just get wiped off the map almost immediately every time..

Happy hunting!

have stones asked about just joining sol against sof+df?

lol ensh coming at ya with that logic boys

Stones =/= logic..

Come now, Enshula..

We only piss off a select few....that's our nature.

oth: do all those alliances you mentioned having tf policy have same definitions?

The same, I personally wouldnt say that, but they are all similar (some include NW as well for example). As I already posted prior, LaF posted definition is most vague and general definition. Others are bit more specific and state some % amount of land more.