May 6th 2014, 17:24:08
I'm going to try to put as much detail into this as I can without it being a massive wall of text...
Bought a BB Q5 outright on April 14th from a WIND store. Was told that return policy was 15 days from the date of purchase. I specifically asked the rep if the 29th was the last day to return the phone. I was told yes.
April 29th I go to return the phone. I'm told that the 28th was the last day since WIND considers the date of sale as the first day to return (something unique in my experience...). I argue with the lady and I say that I was told the 29th would be fine. She says that the rep who sold it to me was new and gave me wrong information (this is not an excuse). I call customer support and they tell me that they've put in my complaint and I'll receive a call back within 3-5 days.
I get home and I'm not satisfied. I call customer service again and this time speak to a supervisor. The supervisor says that there's nothing they can do since they have no authority over the stores. I ask for contact information for the manager/franchisee/supervisor/district manager etc. in charge of that store. She's unable to give me that information. All she can do is give me the mailing address for the "office of the president" (which is identical to the generic customer service address on the site.)
So here is where I'm at.
1) Wind's return policy states "15 days from the date of purchase." If it is 5pm, one hour FROM now it will be 6pm. If it is 10:05, one minute FROM now will be 10:06. If it is April 14th, one day FROM today will be April 15th. I'm not sure how they can interpret the 14th as being day 1. What if I bought the phone 1 minute before closing? When will I have had my day to consider whether or not I want to return it?
2) A representative of Wind made a specific representation to me that the 14th did not count when she confirmed that I could return the phone on the 29th.
3) The receipt has completely different language when discussing the return policy. It says "within the first 15 days" whereas the policy that was quoted in the store, written on their website, and quote over the phone, is "15 days from the date of purchase." One policy written in two different ways.
In contract law, when a term is found to be ambiguous, it is interpreted AGAINST the party that wrote it. In this case, if I can demonstrate that the return policy is ambiguous, a judge should rule against WIND. Also, given that one WIND representative specifically told me the 29th was fine, and a second WIND representative didn't dispute this, but rather brushed it off by saying "she's new," I have even more evidence that this policy is ambiguous since their own employee didn't agree with the company's interpretation.
Today is the 5th business day since I was supposed to get a call back from customer service. After work my plan is to go into the store, politely explain the situation again (hopefully there is a manager there), and ask for a refund. If they say no, I'm going to politely explain that WIND as a company is competing in a very competitive space and that customer service is an issue many people have raised when it comes to dealing with WIND. My Rogers contract is up in September and I was seriously considering switching to WIND. If they could help resolve this issue it would certainly leave a positive impression of WIND as a company. If they still say no, then I'll pull out the legal stuff. The wording of the terms clearly state 15 days FROM the day of purchase, and since one day FROM today is tomorrow, today cannot count as the first day. Furthermore, their own representative told me that the 29th was fine. Their receipt uses completely different language to explain the return policy. There clearly is ambiguity in terms of the return policy. I am prepared to file a statement of claim for the cost of the phone. If this happens, WIND will be required to attend a pre-trial settlement conference. Even the most junior lawyer in whatever firm is retained by WIND will likely charge several hundred dollars for the time used to prepare for, and attend this conference. At the conference, my lawyer (who costs me nothing), will explain the situation. WIND has two choices. Settle, and refund my phone. Or continue with a court date, which could cost them thousands in legal fees. In the end, they're probably going to settle. I'll ask the manager or employee there if we can please end these silly games, avoid a big headache, and just return the phone. It's brand new. Plastics still on it. Used for maybe 2 hours. No SIM card has ever been in it. Just take it back, sell it, and lets move on.
Thoughts? Anything I'm missing? Anybody have a similar experience?
Bought a BB Q5 outright on April 14th from a WIND store. Was told that return policy was 15 days from the date of purchase. I specifically asked the rep if the 29th was the last day to return the phone. I was told yes.
April 29th I go to return the phone. I'm told that the 28th was the last day since WIND considers the date of sale as the first day to return (something unique in my experience...). I argue with the lady and I say that I was told the 29th would be fine. She says that the rep who sold it to me was new and gave me wrong information (this is not an excuse). I call customer support and they tell me that they've put in my complaint and I'll receive a call back within 3-5 days.
I get home and I'm not satisfied. I call customer service again and this time speak to a supervisor. The supervisor says that there's nothing they can do since they have no authority over the stores. I ask for contact information for the manager/franchisee/supervisor/district manager etc. in charge of that store. She's unable to give me that information. All she can do is give me the mailing address for the "office of the president" (which is identical to the generic customer service address on the site.)
So here is where I'm at.
1) Wind's return policy states "15 days from the date of purchase." If it is 5pm, one hour FROM now it will be 6pm. If it is 10:05, one minute FROM now will be 10:06. If it is April 14th, one day FROM today will be April 15th. I'm not sure how they can interpret the 14th as being day 1. What if I bought the phone 1 minute before closing? When will I have had my day to consider whether or not I want to return it?
2) A representative of Wind made a specific representation to me that the 14th did not count when she confirmed that I could return the phone on the 29th.
3) The receipt has completely different language when discussing the return policy. It says "within the first 15 days" whereas the policy that was quoted in the store, written on their website, and quote over the phone, is "15 days from the date of purchase." One policy written in two different ways.
In contract law, when a term is found to be ambiguous, it is interpreted AGAINST the party that wrote it. In this case, if I can demonstrate that the return policy is ambiguous, a judge should rule against WIND. Also, given that one WIND representative specifically told me the 29th was fine, and a second WIND representative didn't dispute this, but rather brushed it off by saying "she's new," I have even more evidence that this policy is ambiguous since their own employee didn't agree with the company's interpretation.
Today is the 5th business day since I was supposed to get a call back from customer service. After work my plan is to go into the store, politely explain the situation again (hopefully there is a manager there), and ask for a refund. If they say no, I'm going to politely explain that WIND as a company is competing in a very competitive space and that customer service is an issue many people have raised when it comes to dealing with WIND. My Rogers contract is up in September and I was seriously considering switching to WIND. If they could help resolve this issue it would certainly leave a positive impression of WIND as a company. If they still say no, then I'll pull out the legal stuff. The wording of the terms clearly state 15 days FROM the day of purchase, and since one day FROM today is tomorrow, today cannot count as the first day. Furthermore, their own representative told me that the 29th was fine. Their receipt uses completely different language to explain the return policy. There clearly is ambiguity in terms of the return policy. I am prepared to file a statement of claim for the cost of the phone. If this happens, WIND will be required to attend a pre-trial settlement conference. Even the most junior lawyer in whatever firm is retained by WIND will likely charge several hundred dollars for the time used to prepare for, and attend this conference. At the conference, my lawyer (who costs me nothing), will explain the situation. WIND has two choices. Settle, and refund my phone. Or continue with a court date, which could cost them thousands in legal fees. In the end, they're probably going to settle. I'll ask the manager or employee there if we can please end these silly games, avoid a big headache, and just return the phone. It's brand new. Plastics still on it. Used for maybe 2 hours. No SIM card has ever been in it. Just take it back, sell it, and lets move on.
Thoughts? Anything I'm missing? Anybody have a similar experience?
Minister
The Omega
Omega Retal Policy/Contacts: http://tinyurl.com/owpvakm (Earth Wiki)
Apply: http://tinyurl.com/mydc8by (Boxcar)
The Omega
Omega Retal Policy/Contacts: http://tinyurl.com/owpvakm (Earth Wiki)
Apply: http://tinyurl.com/mydc8by (Boxcar)


EE Patron